Examining the Evidence
Applying rigorous analysis to historical and textual claims about Jesus and the Bible.
Key Takeaways
Christianity has a 2,000-year intellectual tradition with rigorous philosophical and historical scholarship supporting its claims
The resurrection of Jesus is the central historical claim of Christianity and can be evaluated using standard historical methodology
Many prominent atheists-turned-Christians cite intellectual reasons for their conversion, including examination of evidence
Science and Christianity are not inherently in conflict - many scientific pioneers were devout Christians motivated by faith
The New Testament documents are among the best-attested ancient texts, with manuscript evidence far exceeding other historical works
Faith is not opposed to reason but is trust based on evidence - biblical faith is never presented as belief without grounds
Why Bible Study Matters for Former Atheists
Your analytical skills are assets in understanding Scripture, not obstacles to faith. Engage with Christianity's intellectual heritage through our comprehensive features.
🔬
Evidence-Based Approach
Examine the historical, archaeological, and textual evidence for Christianity. No blind faith required - investigate the claims for yourself.
🧠
Intellectual Respect
Your questions and skepticism are valued here. Critical thinking is welcomed as a tool for discovering truth, not suppressed as a threat to faith.
🔍
Honest Inquiry
Engage with Scripture using the same analytical skills you applied to evaluating other claims. Truth can withstand scrutiny.
📚
Scholarly Resources
Access peer-reviewed research, philosophical arguments, and academic engagement with Christianity from credentialed scholars.
🤝
Understanding Community
Connect with others who have made the journey from atheism to faith. Find people who understand your background and questions.
🌱
Gradual Growth
No pressure to accept everything immediately. Faith often develops incrementally as evidence accumulates and understanding deepens.
From Skepticism to Faith
See how former atheists engage with Scripture and evidence
Intellectual Dialogue
Engaging with tough questions through rigorous philosophical discussion.
Deep Reading
Engaging with Scripture analytically, taking notes and examining context.
Skeptics Welcome Groups
Finding community where questions are encouraged and examined seriously.
Science-Faith Integration
Exploring how scientific discovery and biblical truth can coexist.
Finding Truth
The satisfaction of conclusions reached through honest investigation.
Bible Study Topics for Former Atheists
Comprehensive resources for intellectual engagement with faith. Pair with our doubters Bible study for additional perspectives on tough questions.
Examining the Evidence
Investigating the historical and scientific case for Christianity
- The Historical Resurrection - Examining the Evidence
- Manuscript Reliability - How We Know What the Bible Originally Said
- Archaeological Confirmations of Biblical Accounts
- The Fine-Tuning Argument - Physics and Design
- The Moral Argument - Objective Ethics and God
- Fulfilled Prophecy - Statistical Impossibilities
Philosophical Foundations
Rational arguments for God and Christianity
- The Cosmological Argument - Why Something Rather Than Nothing
- The Ontological Argument - Perfect Being Theology
- The Argument from Consciousness - Mind Beyond Matter
- The Problem of Evil - Theodicy for Thinkers
- Free Will and Determinism in Christian Thought
- The Coherence of Christian Theism
Science and Faith
Reconciling scientific understanding with biblical Christianity
- Big Bang Cosmology and Genesis - Complementary Accounts
- Evolution and Creation - Different Perspectives
- Neuroscience and the Soul - Mind-Body Questions
- The Limits of Naturalism - What Science Cannot Answer
- Christian Scientists Throughout History
- Methodological vs Philosophical Naturalism
Living Faith Intellectually
Practicing Christianity without abandoning reason
- Faith and Reason - Partners Not Enemies
- Dealing with Unanswered Questions
- When Emotions Lag Behind Intellectual Assent
- Finding a Church That Values Your Mind
- Talking to Atheist Friends and Family
- Integrating New Identity with Past Worldview
What Former Atheists Are Saying
Real testimonials from those who found faith through intellectual inquiry
"I spent 15 years as a committed atheist, teaching philosophy at a secular university. The arguments I encountered through Bible Way and similar resources eventually convinced me that theism - and specifically Christianity - was the most rational position. My conversion was intellectual before it was emotional."
Dr. James L.
Philosophy Professor, Former Atheist
"As a scientist, I thought faith required checking my brain at the door. Bible Way showed me that Christianity has a robust intellectual tradition. The evidence for the resurrection particularly convinced me - when I examined it like any other historical claim, the conclusion was surprising."
Sarah M.
Software Engineer
"I read all the New Atheist books and debated Christians online for years. What changed my mind was actually reading the primary sources - the Bible and the church fathers - instead of just critiques. Bible Way helped me engage with the text honestly."
Michael K.
Former New Atheist Movement Member
Resources for Former Atheists
Tools designed for analytical minds exploring faith. Complements our new believers study for foundational concepts.
📊
Evidence Tracker
A systematic framework for cataloging and evaluating evidence for and against Christian claims - treating faith like any other truth claim.
📖
Philosophical Library
Curated collection of arguments from Plantinga, Craig, Swinburne, and other philosopher-theologians engaging atheist objections.
🔬
Science-Faith Integration
Resources exploring how scientific discoveries relate to biblical claims, from multiple perspectives within Christianity.
📝
Former Atheist Stories
Testimonies from academics, scientists, and ordinary people who moved from atheism to Christianity through intellectual investigation.
💬
Objection Responses
Thoughtful engagement with the strongest atheist arguments - not strawmen but the best versions of skeptical challenges.
🗺️
Reading Roadmap
Structured progression through Scripture designed for analytical minds, with commentary addressing common stumbling blocks.
Famous Atheists Who Became Christians
The history of Christianity includes numerous prominent intellectuals who began as atheists or skeptics and converted after examining the evidence. C.S. Lewis, Oxford professor and author of "Mere Christianity," called himself "the most dejected and reluctant convert in all England" after his intellectual journey from atheism. Alister McGrath, now a theologian at Oxford, was an atheist during his scientific training who converted through examining the rationality of Christian belief. Antony Flew, one of the twentieth century's most influential atheist philosophers, shocked the academic world by announcing his conversion to theism based on scientific evidence for design. Lee Strobel, an investigative journalist and legal editor for the Chicago Tribune, set out to disprove Christianity for his wife and instead became convinced of its truth. Holly Ordway, a literature professor and committed atheist, converted after encountering the intellectual depth of Christian writers and the historical evidence for the resurrection.
What these conversions share is not emotional manipulation or crisis-driven decisions but sustained intellectual engagement with the evidence. Many report spending years examining claims, reading primary sources, and wrestling with arguments before reaching their conclusions. Their stories demonstrate that the path from atheism to Christianity need not involve abandoning intellectual integrity but can be the result of following evidence wherever it leads. As C.S. Lewis wrote, "I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else." Faith founded on evidence and reason often proves more durable than faith based on upbringing or emotional experience alone.
Notable Atheist-to-Christian Converts:
✓C.S. Lewis - Oxford Professor
✓Lee Strobel - Journalist
✓Alister McGrath - Scientist
✓Francis Collins - Geneticist
✓Antony Flew - Philosopher
✓Holly Ordway - Professor
Begin Your Intellectual Exploration
Join thousands discovering that faith and reason are partners. Perfect for online Bible study at your own pace.
What You Will Find
- Evidence-based exploration of Christian claims
- Philosophical arguments from credentialed scholars
- Historical evidence for the resurrection
- Community that values your analytical skills
🔬
"I spent 20 years as a committed materialist. What changed my mind was not emotional manipulation but examining the actual evidence for the resurrection using the same historical criteria I would apply to any ancient event. The conclusion surprised me - but good thinking follows evidence, not prior commitments."
Dr. Robert T.
History Professor, Former Atheist
Frequently Asked Questions
Honest answers to questions former atheists ask about faith, evidence, and Christianity
How can an intelligent person believe in God?
This question assumes that belief in God is irrational, but some of history's greatest minds have been theists - from Aristotle and Aquinas to Newton, Faraday, and modern philosophers like Alvin Plantinga. The question of God's existence involves philosophical arguments (cosmological, teleological, moral, ontological) that serious thinkers have debated for millennia. While not everyone finds these arguments conclusive, dismissing them as obviously false ignores significant intellectual work. Many former atheists report that their conversion came not from abandoning reason but from applying it more thoroughly - examining assumptions they had never questioned and following arguments wherever they led. The real question is not whether intelligent people can believe but whether the evidence and arguments justify belief. That requires engagement rather than dismissal.
What evidence exists for Jesus' resurrection?
The resurrection is the central historical claim of Christianity and can be evaluated using standard historical methodology. Several facts are accepted by the vast majority of historians, including skeptics: Jesus died by crucifixion, his tomb was found empty shortly after, his followers had experiences they believed were appearances of the risen Jesus, and their beliefs transformed them from fearful deserters into bold proclaimers willing to die for their claims. The question becomes: what best explains these facts? Alternative explanations (conspiracy, hallucination, wrong tomb, swoon theory) have been extensively critiqued. Scholars like Gary Habermas, N.T. Wright, and William Lane Craig have compiled extensive arguments. Even some non-Christian historians like Gerd Ludemann acknowledge the difficulty of explaining the evidence naturalistically. The resurrection is not believed blindly but because it provides the best explanation for the historical data.
Doesn't science disprove religion?
This common claim confuses methodological naturalism (science studies natural causes) with philosophical naturalism (only natural causes exist). Science as a method cannot address questions beyond the physical - purpose, meaning, values, or the existence of anything non-material. Many founding scientists - Newton, Kepler, Faraday, Maxwell - were devout Christians who saw no conflict. Modern scientists like Francis Collins (led Human Genome Project), John Lennox (Oxford mathematician), and Ard Louis (Oxford physicist) maintain that science and faith address different questions. Specific conflicts are often overstated: the Big Bang theory was initially resisted by some scientists precisely because it implied a cosmic beginning that sounded too much like creation. Evolution describes biological change over time; it does not answer why anything exists or whether purpose underlies the process. The claim that "science disproves God" is itself a philosophical statement that science cannot make.
Why should I trust the Bible when it was written by humans?
All historical documents were written by humans, yet we accept many as reliable. The question is whether these human authors transmitted accurate information. The New Testament documents meet and exceed standard historical criteria for reliability: early dating (written within decades of events, when eyewitnesses lived), multiple independent sources, embarrassing details about the authors themselves (cowardice, confusion, slowness to believe), manuscript evidence (over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, more than any other ancient text), and external corroboration from non-Christian sources like Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny. The documents also show marks of eyewitness testimony - incidental details, vivid descriptions, and undesigned coincidences between accounts. Christians believe these authors were guided by God, but even skeptics should take seriously their historical reliability by normal historiographical standards.
What about all the violence and immorality in the Bible?
Difficult passages deserve honest engagement rather than dismissal or superficial answers. Several principles help. First, the Bible describes many things it does not endorse - the sins of biblical figures are often recorded precisely as warnings. Second, progressive revelation shows God working within fallen human cultures, improving conditions gradually rather than imposing ideals they could not accept. Old Testament slavery regulations, while troubling to modern readers, dramatically improved treatment compared to surrounding cultures and planted seeds that would eventually abolish slavery. Third, literary context matters - some passages are poetry, hyperbole, or reflect ancient Near Eastern conventions modern readers misunderstand. Fourth, moral criticism assumes moral standards - but where do those standards come from if not from a moral lawgiver? Atheism struggles to ground objective morality. Finally, the Bible culminates in Jesus, who provides the interpretive lens for all of Scripture. His teachings on love, forgiveness, and sacrificial service represent Christianity's ethical core.
Don't all religions basically teach the same thing?
This popular claim does not survive examination. Major religions make contradictory truth claims about fundamental questions: Is God personal or impersonal? One or many? Is the material world real or illusion? Is human nature basically good, neutral, or fallen? Do we need salvation and, if so, from what and how? Is there life after death? Christianity claims Jesus is God incarnate, died for sins, and rose bodily - claims Islam explicitly denies. Buddhism teaches no-self; Christianity teaches eternal individual personhood. Hinduism presents a vast array of beliefs, some compatible with Western theism, many not. These differences matter if truth matters. Saying "all religions are the same" typically means: all emphasize ethics (partly true but doesn't make their truth claims equivalent), all provide meaning (true but meaning can be based on false beliefs), or disagreements don't matter (which is itself a religious claim). The question is which claims, if any, are actually true.
How can you believe in miracles in a scientific age?
The objection assumes miracles are impossible or improbable, but this depends on prior beliefs about whether God exists. If God does not exist, miracles are indeed impossible. But if God does exist, there is no reason He could not act in the world He created. Science describes how nature normally operates (laws); it cannot demonstrate that exceptions are impossible. Philosopher David Hume's argument against miracles is circular - he assumes uniform experience against miracles, but that assumes no reliable miracle reports exist, which is the very question at issue. The real question is whether there is good evidence for any specific miracle, particularly the resurrection of Jesus. Historical evidence must be evaluated on its merits, not dismissed a priori because miracles are "impossible." Many former atheists report that examining the resurrection evidence forced them to reconsider their naturalistic assumptions. Science tells us what happens under normal conditions; it cannot rule out that extraordinary events have ever occurred.
I believed before but studied my way out. Why would studying help me believe again?
Many who "studied their way out" of faith encountered weak versions of Christianity that could not withstand scrutiny - and rightly rejected them. However, the Christianity they rejected may not represent the strongest version of the faith. Scholars like N.T. Wright, Alvin Plantinga, William Lane Craig, and Richard Swinburne engage at the highest academic levels with sophisticated arguments. Many former believers deconstructed cultural Christianity (often mixed with politics, nationalism, or legalism) without encountering robust philosophical and historical arguments for Christianity itself. Interestingly, some who studied their way out later studied their way back in when exposed to better scholarship. Former atheist Alister McGrath describes his journey this way - early exposure to simplistic Christianity could not withstand his scientific training, but later encountering rigorous Christian thought changed his assessment. The question is not whether you studied but what you studied and whether stronger resources might deserve engagement.
What's the best argument for God's existence?
Different arguments resonate with different people based on background and temperament. The cosmological argument observes that contingent things require causes and reasons for existence, leading to a necessary being (argued by Leibniz, refined by Alexander Pruss and Joshua Rasmussen). The fine-tuning argument notes that physical constants are precisely calibrated for life in ways that appear designed (Robin Collins, Luke Barnes). The moral argument contends that objective moral values require a moral lawgiver (C.S. Lewis, William Lane Craig). The argument from consciousness suggests that subjective experience cannot be reduced to physical processes (J.P. Moreland, David Chalmers - though Chalmers is not a theist). The argument from reason (Alvin Plantinga, C.S. Lewis) notes that naturalism undermines the reliability of cognitive faculties. Most philosophers find cumulative case arguments compelling - no single argument may be conclusive, but together they build a strong case. Engaging with these arguments seriously, rather than caricatures, is essential for honest evaluation.
How do I tell atheist friends and family about my faith journey?
This is often more challenging than the intellectual journey itself. Several principles help. First, timing matters - forcing conversations rarely helps, while waiting for natural opportunities allows more receptive discussions. Second, lead with your story rather than arguments - describing your own intellectual journey is less confrontational than immediately challenging their views. Third, acknowledge their perspective - you understand atheism from the inside; this creates credibility and connection. Fourth, don't expect immediate agreement - your journey took time, theirs will too. Fifth, be prepared for varied reactions - some may be curious, others hostile, many simply puzzled. Sixth, maintain relationships regardless of their response - demonstrating that your new faith hasn't made you arrogant or judgmental matters more than winning arguments. Seventh, know your limits - you don't have to answer every objection immediately. Saying "that's a good question; let me think about it" is honest and models intellectual humility. Finally, some relationships may need boundaries if hostility becomes severe, while others may open unexpected doors.
What if I'm intellectually convinced but don't feel it emotionally?
This gap between intellectual assent and emotional conviction is common among former atheists, and it's actually normal. Emotions often lag behind cognition, especially when revising deeply held beliefs. Your whole emotional world was built around atheism; it will take time for new emotional patterns to develop. Several approaches help bridge this gap. First, recognize that faith in Scripture is primarily about trust and commitment, not feelings - Abraham followed God's call despite unclear feelings. Second, practice spiritual disciplines even when they feel empty - prayer, Scripture reading, and community create space for emotional engagement to develop. Third, engage worship through music, nature, and beauty - these often touch emotions more directly than arguments. Fourth, be patient with yourself - emotional transformation typically takes longer than intellectual conviction. Fifth, seek community with those who understand - both former atheists and mature believers can provide encouragement. Sixth, consider whether residual emotions might be resistance rather than honest assessment - sometimes our feelings protect old worldviews from evidence. The goal is integration over time, not immediate emotional transformation.
How do I find a church that will value my analytical approach?
Not all churches engage well with intellectually oriented seekers, but many do. Look for these markers: sermons that engage with difficult texts rather than avoiding them, adult education classes on apologetics, philosophy, or science-faith questions, leadership that welcomes questions and admits uncertainty on secondary issues, members with advanced education who have integrated faith and learning, and connections to broader intellectual Christianity (books, podcasts, conferences). Consider churches near universities, which often develop cultures comfortable with analytical inquiry. Denominations vary - Reformed, Anglican, Catholic, and some evangelical churches have strong intellectual traditions. Ask pastors directly about their approach to tough questions. Visit adult classes, not just services. Remember that even the best church will have members less interested in intellectual engagement - you're looking for a place where your approach is welcomed, not necessarily where everyone shares it. Online communities and conferences (like Veritas Forum, BioLogos, Reasonable Faith) can supplement local church involvement with intellectual engagement.
Trusted Resources for Intellectual Seekers
External resources that engage seriously with questions about faith and evidence
Reasonable Faith
Philosophical and apologetic resources from Dr. William Lane Craig addressing intellectual questions about Christianity
reasonablefaith.org →Got Questions
Biblical answers to thousands of questions about faith, life, and difficult topics from a Christian perspective
gotquestions.org →BibleGateway
Read Scripture in multiple translations with study notes and scholarly commentaries for deeper exploration
biblegateway.com →BioLogos
Exploring the harmony between science and biblical faith, founded by Francis Collins
biologos.org →